|
|
DJIA
|
S&P
500
|
|
Support
|
8900-8950, 8200-8260
|
1068-1078, 936-962
|
|
Resistance
|
10,800-10,875,11,000-11,050
|
1270-1275, 1375-1390
|
|
Short Term
|
Neutral
|
Neutral
|
|
Medium Term
|
Neutral
|
Neutral
|
|
Long Term
|
Bear
|
Bear
|
Indicator
|
05/03/01
|
05/02/01
|
05/01/01
|
04/30/01
|
04/27/01
|
|
Breadth oscillator
|
+220
|
+299
|
+394
|
+392
|
+311
|
|
Volume oscillator
|
+65.3
|
+147.1
|
+251.6
|
+240.8
|
+221.8
|
|
A/D ratio
|
1.27
|
1.32
|
1.41
|
1.41
|
1.36
|
|
Three day oscillator
|
-124
|
+349
|
+649
|
+590
|
+822
|
|
McClellan oscillator
|
+78
|
+129
|
+150
|
+136
|
+138
|
|
Open 10 day Arms
|
1.03
|
.95
|
.86
|
.88
|
.85
|
|
10 Day Arms
|
1.09
|
.98
|
.94
|
.94
|
.94
|
|
CBOE P/C ratio
|
.72
|
.55
|
.64
|
.49
|
.63
|
|
OEX P/C ratio
|
1.07
|
.94
|
1.52
|
1.28
|
1.31
|
|
New highs
|
65*
|
93
|
91
|
136
|
162
|
New lows
|
18*
|
11
|
11
|
10
|
11
|
*These are preliminary numbers and will be
adjusted tomorrow
The DJIA lost 80 points and the S&P lost 19
points on 1.10 billion shares. The A/D line lost 600 units. The new highs
contracted sharply and the new lows expanded slightly. The Russell 2000 lost
5.99 points. The short-term is neutral but still on the overbought side. The
medium-term is bullish. The Value-line lost 18.71 points. The short-term is
neutral. The medium-term is bullish. The NASDAQ Composite lost 74 points and
the NASDAQ 100 lost 85 points. The short-term is neutral but still on the
overbought side. The medium-term is neutral but with a positive bias. The
DJTA closed lower. The short-term is neutral. The medium-term is also
neutral. The DJUA and UTY closed lower but well off their lows. They are negative
in all time frames.
The S&P
moved below Wednesday’s low confirming the rally from Tuesday as a completed
wave on the daily chart. The hourly chart from Tuesday into Wednesday’s high
can be counted as either a three or a five but if it is a five, wave 5 ended
on a small failure. The S&P also moved below Tuesday’s low eliminating
the possibility that the Tuesday-Wednesday rally is part of a larger third
wave from April 25. If the rally is a five I can count is as wave 5 from
April 4, which would indicate that the S&P is in the process of
correcting the post April 4 but possibly the post March 22 rally. If the
rally is a three we can count it as a “b” wave of an irregular from Monday.
However, “b” waves are always followed by “c” waves, and “c” waves are always
fives. If the rally is a three then we are also faced with what is so far a
three-wave decline from Wednesday, which means that the decline is not over.
Frankly I have no real high confidence count on the S&P as there are just
too many variables. However, I do see the possibility that the pattern from
April 4 is complete albeit ending on a very small failure and that we are in
the early stages of correcting that rally. While there are a lot of viable
alternatives for the sake of simplicity lest go with that count at least for
now. The DJIA moved below Wednesday’s low confirming the rally from April 25
as a completed wave on the daily chart. The hourly chart from April 25 into
Wednesday is clearly corrective with a number of overlaps. There are three
possibilities in regards to the pattern. The first is that the five-wave
pattern completed on April 26 and that the rally from that point is a “b”
wave of an irregular. If so then we are in wave “c” with lower prices ahead.
The second is that the entire post April 25 advance is a large diagonal
triangle, completing wave 5 of iii from April 4. The latter is that the rally
from early on April 26 is an extended fifth wave diagonal triangle from April
25. In both of the latter cases the “e” wave of the pattern ended on a very
small failure. If either of those counts are correct we will know as early as
today as both the diagonal triangle and the failure imply a weak pattern that
should lead to a sharp and quick break back to the beginning of the pattern.
The NDX confirmed the rally from Tuesday as a completed wave and also moved
well below support related to that rally. It also looks to have confirmed the
rally from April 25 as a three-wave pattern on both the daily and hourly
charts. This leaves us with two wave counts. The first is that the rally from
April 25 is a “b” or X wave from
April 20 and the current decline a “c” wave or the beginning of a second
three. In either of these counts a move below the April 25 low should be
expected to complete the pattern from April 20. The decline yesterday is so
far a three-wave structure on the hourly chart and also stopped not far from
a .618 retracement of the rally from April 25. This leaves us with the other
possibility and that is the rally from April 25 into Wednesday was wave “a”
of a second three from the April 4 low and a “c” wave is close at hand. A
move below 1820-1833 zone would eliminate this count while a move above
Wednesday’s high would confirm that wave “c” was underway. Support: S&P
1230-1232, 1200-1202, DJIA; 10,630-10,640, 10,450-10,470, NDX; 1820-1833,
1720-1740. Resistance: S&P; 1252-1253, 1260-1262, 1272-1275, DJIA;
10,850-10,863, 10,920-10,950, NDX; 1890-1895, 1932-1940, 1981.
The averages
close lower but did bounce late in the session to close off the lows. The
DJIA bounced harder and closed well off its lows and about in the middle of
the days range showing some positive relative strength for the first time in
a few days. The S&P did close off its low but did not bounce nearly ass
hard as the DJIA and ended up much closer to the lows than the highs losing
about twice as much as the DJIA on a percentage basis. We did see an easing
in volume but low volume on declines is just as often bearish as it is
bullish. Breadth was only modestly negative as it recovered from over 2 to 1
negative to only a 3 to 2 negative plurality. The new highs did ease after
diverging for two days. The new lows did expand but only modestly so and the
absolute level is still quite benign. The NASDAQ averages were hit a lot harder
than the listed averages and also bounced a lot less closing much closer to
their session lows reversing a couple of days of strong relative strength.
The CBOE put to
call ratio moved up nicely and was back to mid neutral. The OEX ratio moved
higher but only slightly so and was close to bearish. The breadth oscillator
moved lower. It is neutral but still closer to overbought. The volume
oscillator moved lower and is neutral although still close to overbought. The
3-day oscillator is neutral. The McClellan oscillator moved lower. It is
neutral. The 10-day and open 10-day Arms moved higher. They are neutral but
the open 10 is close to oversold. The 5-day Arms is neutral. The 21-day Arms
is also neutral but moving towards overbought. The new 10-day Arms moved
above .80 completing another sell signal. The daily range oscillators are
turning down from mild overbought levels. The daily trend oscillators are
neutral.
Was yesterday
the beginning of a correction that is long overdue or just a very short-term
reaction that will be over in a blink of an eye? At this time it is too
difficult a call as the indicators continue to give off mixed signals that
could support either possibility. So far the decline has not violated any
real important short-term support levels although on the NDX it did come
close. The wave structure is not conclusive but tends to favor further
weakness notwithstanding a bounce. Momentum indicators remain mixed. Breadth
related measures have corrected the overbought condition and are back to
neutral albeit high neutral. In a midst of a strong medium-term up trend that
is all that is required so the next couple of days could tell us a lot. The
volume oscillator has corrected more but is still close to overbought. On the
positive side both the 10-day and open 10-day Arms have moved up sharply and
from very overbought around April 20 they are now close to oversold. On the
other hand, the new 10 Arms has just yesterday given its third or fourth sell
signal (one as borderline since April 5 and is completing a pattern seen in
mid January stretching into early February. Short-term sentiment is mixed.
The CBOE put to call ratio yesterday did move higher into a modest decline.
This is a plus but the 10-day moving average while moving up a little is still
close to where it was in early February. In addition, the Rydex ratio hit its
worst level since the rally from late March, early April got underway, with
the asset levels in both Ursa and Arktos not far from where they were in late
January. In addition, the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII)
reported a strong rise in bulls and drop in bears. The percentage of bulls
reached 64% the highest since late July of last year and the 23% bears the
lowest since mid February. The bottom line is that the short-term picture
remains mixed enough to remain in the neutral camp. Medium-term it is likely
that the late March-early April time frame did indeed complete a medium-term
low in the NASDAQ and the S&P and that we are currently in a strong bear
market rally. I am going to stay neutral but with a positive bias awaiting a
better entry point. Long-term I remain bearish. The bonds had another good
day allying strongly. The short-term remains bullish and further gains are
expected. The medium-term is neutral.
The XAU has moved towards support near 54. The next couple of days are
important. For now I will maintain my bullish position in all time frames but
that could change soon.
QQQ traders are
flat Make sure to call the Noon Pacific hotline for any changes. Rydex
switchers are holding a 20% Precious metals and 10% OTC position. Make sure
to call the Noon Pacific hotline for any changes. The morning hotline will be
on at 7:15 AM Pacific time.
We
can se from the chart below that the hourly chary of the DJIA from the April
25 low to Wednesday’s high is clearly sloppy overlapping and corrective. The
chart shows the three possible wave counts discussed in the Elliott wave
section of the report. The “a” wave of the diagonal is either from the April
25 low if the whole pattern is a diagonal or began from wave 4 and is part of
a fifth wave diagonal from the April 26 low. In either case, we can see the
small failure for wave “e”, which implies a lot of underlying weakness.
|