|
|
DJIA
|
S&P
500
|
|
Support
|
8900-8950, 8200-8260
|
1068-1078, 936-962
|
|
Resistance
|
10,280-10,300,11,000-11,050
|
1270-1275, 1375-1390
|
|
Short Term
|
Neutral
|
Neutral
|
|
Medium Term
|
Neutral
|
Neutral
|
|
Long Term
|
Bear
|
Bear
|
Indicator
|
03/22/01
|
03/21/01
|
03/20/01
|
03/19/01
|
03/16/01
|
|
Breadth oscillator
|
-789
|
-608
|
-394
|
-282
|
-343
|
|
Volume oscillator
|
-487.8
|
-383.6
|
-286.1
|
-195.5
|
-234.6
|
|
A/D ratio
|
.68
|
.77
|
.90
|
.98
|
.96
|
|
Three day oscillator
|
-1162
|
-777
|
-205
|
+51
|
-753
|
|
McClellan oscillator
|
-230
|
-178
|
-127
|
-120
|
-187
|
|
Open 10 day Arms
|
1.29
|
1.27
|
1.24
|
1.15
|
1.19
|
|
10 Day Arms
|
1.66
|
1.65
|
1.62
|
1.50
|
1.52
|
|
CBOE P/C ratio
|
.74
|
.86
|
.61
|
.57
|
1.08
|
|
OEX P/C ratio
|
1.25
|
1.16
|
.98
|
.88
|
1.55
|
|
New highs
|
54*
|
28
|
47
|
40
|
23
|
New lows
|
270*
|
113
|
48
|
73
|
99
|
*These
are preliminary numbers and will be adjusted tomorrow
The DJIA lost
97 points and the S&P lost around 5 points. Volume expanded sharply
reaching 1.73 billion shares. The A/D line lost 1600 units. The new highs
eased and the new lows expanded sharply. The Russell 2000 lost 2.94 points
but did close well off the session low. The short-term is neutral and remains
very oversold. The medium-term is negative but is also approaching oversold
readings. The Value-line lost 8.10 points. The short-term is neutral and
remains very oversold. The medium-term is negative. The NASDAQ Composite
gained 67 points and the NASDAQ 100 gained 97 points. The short-term is
neutral but very close to going positive. The medium-term is neutral but also
improving. The DJTA lost 46 points but did close well off its low. The
short-term is neutral and deeply oversold. The medium-term is negative. The
DJUA and UTY closed with very sharp losses but did manage a bit of a bounce
late in the day. They remain negative in all time frames.
The S&P broke well below the 100 level, a
level I deemed as important this week. The break of that level adds a lot of
support to the idea that the S&P is still in its third wave from January
31. There are a number of probable starting points for wave 3. The simplest
is that wave 3 began on February 27 and if that is the case it is possible
that the decline from Tuesday is wave .5 of 3. There is also a distinct
possibility that we are completing only wave ..5 of .3 of 3. In either case
it is next to impossible to count the decline from January 31 as a five so we
need to look for lower prices, but how many 4’s and 5’s are left is not
clear. The decline from Tuesday on the hourly chart is also next to impossible to count as a
five so we should see lower prices to complete this pattern. However it is
not entirely impossible as we could count the second wave as an irregular
ending on a failure with wave 1 extended. A move today above yesterday’s high
of 1124.27 would confirm that decline as complete on the daily chart. So we
need to focus on that area. A move below yesterday’s low of 1081 could
complete the pattern and set the stage for a decent rally. The DJIA is either
in a “c” wave from January 2000 or a second three is underway. There are two
possible starting points for this decline and they will be discussed in the
letter this weekend. The daily chart from March 8 is showing a three-wave
pattern with the third wave getting underway on Tuesday. This decline is
either wave 3 or wave “c” from March 8. Whether the decline from Tuesday is a
“c” or third wave it needs to unfold as a five. The hourly chart from
Tuesday can be counted as a five but is best counted as having completed
three waves down and needing a small fourth and fifth wave to finish off the
pattern. A move today above yesterday’s high of 9498 would confirm the
decline from Tuesday as complete. Until then we need to look for a move below
yesterday’s low to complete the pattern from Tuesday. The NDX continues to
find support around the important 1600 level+/- 2%. The NDX moved above
Wednesday’s high confirming the decline from Tuesday as a completed wave on
the daily chart. The decline from Tuesday on the surface is corrective. That
leaves us with a couple of wave counts. The first and most bullish is that this
decline was wave “e” of a diagonal triangle from March 5 which could be
counted as a fifth wave from January 24. It is also possible that Tuesday’s
decline is wave “c” of a diagonal triangle from March 15. If correct we need
to head lower almost immediately. In addition, this decline could not be
counted as wave 5 from January 24 but may be counted as wave .5 of iii. The
last possibility is that yesterday’s rally was a “c” wave of an irregular
from Wednesday’s early low which can also be counted as having completed wave
.5 of 3. The real key on the NDX, at least for this week is last weeks high
of 1814 as a move above that level would confirm that the decline from
January was a completed wave on the weekly chart. Support: S&P;
1105-1106, 1097-1099, 1070-1072, DJIA; 9320-9324, 9239-9248, 8954-8966, NDX;
1663-1164, 1640-1643, 1596-1608. Resistance: S&P; 1124, 1131-1133,
1142.1144, DJIA; 9498, 9669-9678, NDX;1710-1730, 1752-1758, 1814.
Instead of getting whacked in the last hour as it
did both Tuesday and Wednesday, the market staged a strong rally. It did all
short as both the DJIA and the S&P ended lower but both closed well off
their lows and the S&P was not too far from a break even day. It is
difficult to call it a key reversal day but it did look like a minor one and
it was also accompanied by a sharp expansion in volume, which reached its
highest level since January 3. Breadth was nearly 3 to 1 negative but did
come back from a more than 5 to 1 plurality. The new highs contracted sharply
and the new lows expanded sharply the latter confirming the new price low.
While the listed stocks closed lower the NASDAQ averages not only closed
higher but closed near their high of the day. This is a real change from what
we have seen throughout most of the decline. It is too early to tell whether
this was a one-day phenomena or a more important shift but it was an
interesting development nonetheless.
The CBOE put to call ratio was a little
disappointing as it was only neutral. The OEX ratio was also neutral. The breadth
and volume oscillators moved lower and are deeply oversold. The 3-day
oscillator is also very oversold but did confirm the new closing low. The
McClellan oscillator also moved to new lows confirming price. The 10-day and
the open 10-day Arms remain extremely oversold. The 5-day Arms is oversold
but only modestly so while the 21-day Arms is deeply oversold. The new 10
Arms is improving and getting closer to bullish levels. The daily range
oscillators are deeply oversold. They are still showing a very slight
divergence on the S&P but have confirmed on both the DJIA and the NYSE
Composite. The daily trend oscillators are negative but on the NDX are very
close to going positive.
Third waves have clear and specific
characteristics. During rallies they display the strongest momentum and the
best internals. In essence everything is in gear. In declining third waves we
see the most negative breadth, the strongest volume and momentum indicators
are at their worst. Yesterday, at its worst the A/D ratio hit its most
negative reading of the decline and in spite of the rally it was still one of
the worst we have had this year. The new lows hit their most negative reading
of the year, confirming price and most importantly, every momentum indicator
I follow moved to new lows. All of this along with price itself at least in
the DJIA and most likely the S&P seems to confirm the idea that we are
still in a third wave. We may indeed be in the latter stages of that third
wave but we clearly look to be in a third wave. All of the key momentum indicators moved to new lows for this
decline eliminating any potential divergences that had been building and
confirming price. This is why I always refer to the divergences as potential
until they are confirmed as real. In studying these indicators at important
market lows it is safe to say that when they reach levels as extreme as they
are now that lower prices are to be expected. In fact, in most cases momentum
troughs of this degree are usually accompanied by not one but usually two
lower lows in price with higher lows in momentum before a low of importance
is completed. Thus even if we are at a momentum low, and again there is
nothing that says we are the odds of this being an important price low is
minimal. This seems to fit in well with the wave counts. Yesterday’s
performance did have some earmarks of a reversal and the huge volume some
earmarks of capitulation. We could be close to a decent rally short-term but
given the overall technical backdrop that is all it will be a decent
short-term rally. Medium-term we could be close to completing the most
negative portion of the decline. In Elliott terms the third of the third but
given the technical backdrop even if the worst is behind us it is clearly not
over. I am going to remain neutral on both the short- and medium-term.
Long-term I remain bearish. The bonds rallied strongly on equity weakness but
again sold off late in the day and closed much closer to the lows of the day.
The rising wedge diagonal triangle remains in play but these patterns are
very hard to define as they are progressing. However, when they are compete
they are easy to define as they y end in a bang. There is no change in
position I am bearish short and medium-term. The XAU is holding above last
Friday’s lo but the pattern does not look great. A move below that low of
48.45 would confirm the rally from October 2000 as a three-wave pattern. I am
neutral in all time frames.
QQQ and stock index futures traders are flat.
Stand aside for the morning. Rydex switchers are holding a 10% OTC position
and 20% Precious Metals position. Make sure to call the Noon pacific hotline
for any changes.
This is just one of many possible counts on the
NDX. A move above 1814 would confirm this as the preferred count.
The hourly chart of the S&P
below shows the decline from Tuesday as best being counted as a three. The
alternate count discussed in the Elliott wave section is shown with wave 2
taking the form of an irregular ending on a failure.

|